This article summarizes wellness reward requirements, disclosure obligations, and practical implications of the recently released wellness program guidance for plan sponsors.
On August 26, 2026, regulatory authorities issued FAQs that provide guidance on health-contingent wellness programs under HIPAA and the Affordable Care Act. The FAQs address two issues at the center of recent litigation involving tobacco-use surcharges.
Issue #1: Are participants who complete a reasonable alternative standard mid-year entitled to receive the wellness reward retroactive to the start of the plan year?
Issue #2: What are the requirements around disclosing the availability of an alternative standard in wellness plan materials?
Wellness Program Basics
Wellness programs must be reasonably designed to promote health or prevent disease, comply with applicable limits on rewards, and offer reasonable alternative standards when required. In addition, HIPAA generally prohibits group health plans from discriminating in eligibility, benefits, or premiums based on a health factor. That said, an exception exists that permits qualifying wellness programs to provide rewards (such as premium discounts, rebates, or reduced cost sharing).
There are three classifications of wellness programs, and how these rules are applied is based on the type of program.
Lastly, health-contingent wellness rewards may not exceed 30% of the cost of applicable coverage or 50% of the cost of applicable coverage for wellness programs designed to prevent or reduce tobacco use.
Reward Rules
Under the 2013 final regulations, a health-contingent wellness program generally must meet the following five criteria:
Issue #1: No Retroactive Reward Required
Supplemental benefits should fill local gaps rather than duplicate benefits employees already receive.
Before introducing a new program, employers should understand what payroll taxes and statutory contributions provide in each country. This includes medical coverage, retirement income, disability protection, paid leave, survivor benefits, and other social programs.
Issue #2: Disclosure Requirement is Tied to the Level of Detail
Confusion has also existed about the requirements for notification of the availability of reasonable alternatives for obtaining wellness rewards.
The FAQs clarify when a notification about the availability of reasonable alternatives must be included in health-contingent wellness program communications.
No Need to Include: A document that merely states that a wellness program exists (without explaining its conditions or reward structure) does not trigger the disclosure requirement. For example, a Summary of Benefits and Coverage that only notes that a participant’s cost sharing may vary based on participation in a wellness program generally need not include the reasonable alternative disclosure.
Must Include: By contrast, enrollment guides, wellness program notices, summaries, websites, and other communications that explain how a participant earns a premium discount, avoids a surcharge, or earns a different reward must include the required disclosure about reasonable alternative methods to earn the reward.
Employers should be mindful of the distinction between a passing reference to a wellness program and a substantive description of such a program.
Employer Action Items
Resources